📊Рейтинг российских политконсультантов в 2024 году
📍Топ-20 федеральных политконсультантов
1. Костин Константин / 17,3 2. Табак Владимир / 16,8 3. Алиев Фирдус / 16,5 4. Казанков Григорий / 16,2 5. Гнатюк Андрей / 15,7 6. Комиссаров Алексей / 15,4 7. Карпилов Олег / 15,3 8. Саркисов Вартан / 15,1 9. Федоров Валерий / 14,7 10. Орлов Дмитрий / 14,3
11. Зверев Сергей / 13,9 12. Чеснаков Алексей / 13,8 13. Гореславский Алексей / 13,7 14. Гращенков Илья / 13,3 15. Чадаев Алексей / 13,2 16. Михайлов Сергей / 13,0 17. Минченко Евгений / 12,7 18. Быстров Петр / 12,6 19. Максимов Андрей / 12,4 20. Игнатовский Ярослав / 12,2
📊Рейтинг российских политконсультантов в 2024 году
📍Топ-20 федеральных политконсультантов
1. Костин Константин / 17,3 2. Табак Владимир / 16,8 3. Алиев Фирдус / 16,5 4. Казанков Григорий / 16,2 5. Гнатюк Андрей / 15,7 6. Комиссаров Алексей / 15,4 7. Карпилов Олег / 15,3 8. Саркисов Вартан / 15,1 9. Федоров Валерий / 14,7 10. Орлов Дмитрий / 14,3
11. Зверев Сергей / 13,9 12. Чеснаков Алексей / 13,8 13. Гореславский Алексей / 13,7 14. Гращенков Илья / 13,3 15. Чадаев Алексей / 13,2 16. Михайлов Сергей / 13,0 17. Минченко Евгений / 12,7 18. Быстров Петр / 12,6 19. Максимов Андрей / 12,4 20. Игнатовский Ярослав / 12,2
#Рейтинг
BY The Гращенков
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. Lastly, the web previews of t.me links have been given a new look, adding chat backgrounds and design elements from the fully-features Telegram Web client. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from tr
