Путин подводит нас к черте, за которой находится то, о чём писали философы Грэм Харман и Юджин Такер. Мир наполнен объектами, чья сущность оказывается сокрыта от нас, но несмотря на ужас столкновения с непознанным, ужас — это ведь тоже один из модусов постижения реальности. Но что же такое ужас, который не ужас-ужас-ужас? Думаю, что это тот минимальный опыт ужасного, который в принципе должен быть у лобового живого человека, например страх Божий. То есть Владимир Владимирович в итоге выводит нас на проблематику экзистенциальной теологии. 💪🇷🇺
Путин подводит нас к черте, за которой находится то, о чём писали философы Грэм Харман и Юджин Такер. Мир наполнен объектами, чья сущность оказывается сокрыта от нас, но несмотря на ужас столкновения с непознанным, ужас — это ведь тоже один из модусов постижения реальности. Но что же такое ужас, который не ужас-ужас-ужас? Думаю, что это тот минимальный опыт ужасного, который в принципе должен быть у лобового живого человека, например страх Божий. То есть Владимир Владимирович в итоге выводит нас на проблематику экзистенциальной теологии. 💪🇷🇺
Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists." Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from tr
