Книга английского филолога и литературного критика Джорджа Сентсбери (1845–1933) о спиртных напитках. Автор подробно рассказывает о традициях употребления, особенностях приготовления и хранения хереса и мадеры, портвейна и виски, кларета и шампанского, бургундского, рейнского и мозельского вин, сидров.
Как истинный гурман и литературовед, Сентсбери не только сравнивает напитки между собой, но и приводит упоминания о них в мировой литературе.
Книга английского филолога и литературного критика Джорджа Сентсбери (1845–1933) о спиртных напитках. Автор подробно рассказывает о традициях употребления, особенностях приготовления и хранения хереса и мадеры, портвейна и виски, кларета и шампанского, бургундского, рейнского и мозельского вин, сидров.
Как истинный гурман и литературовед, Сентсбери не только сравнивает напитки между собой, но и приводит упоминания о них в мировой литературе.
Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. Crude oil prices edged higher after tumbling on Thursday, when U.S. West Texas intermediate slid back below $110 per barrel after topping as much as $130 a barrel in recent sessions. Still, gas prices at the pump rose to fresh highs. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from tr
