❗️КОНТАКТ ТОЛЬКО ДЛЯ ВОЕННЫХ СОУ, КОТОРЫЕ БЕРУТ В ПЛЕН ОРКОВ
У программы «Обменный фонд Владимира и Дмитрия» появился новый анонимный спонсор из рф, который уже перевёл на счёт фонда $20 тысяч.
Подробности участия в программе ЗДЕСЬ О самой программе - ЗДЕСЬ
❗️Обязательное условие для видео с пленным орком: - назвать дату взятия орка в плен - фио - д/р - звание - должность - откуда он - сказать, что видео записано для «Обменного фонда Дмитрия и Владимира»
❗️КОНТАКТ ТОЛЬКО ДЛЯ ВОЕННЫХ СОУ, КОТОРЫЕ БЕРУТ В ПЛЕН ОРКОВ
У программы «Обменный фонд Владимира и Дмитрия» появился новый анонимный спонсор из рф, который уже перевёл на счёт фонда $20 тысяч.
Подробности участия в программе ЗДЕСЬ О самой программе - ЗДЕСЬ
❗️Обязательное условие для видео с пленным орком: - назвать дату взятия орка в плен - фио - д/р - звание - должность - откуда он - сказать, что видео записано для «Обменного фонда Дмитрия и Владимира»
Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications.
from tw
