Germanic Cosmology Interview
<unknown>
This is our most recent interview doing a deep-dive into Germanic Cosmology!
This is a sequel and companion interview to the Who are the Gods of Germania returning with author & researcher William P. Reaves and the scholars at The Norrœna Society, Mark Puryear and Kyle Davis.
Sometimes the most profound findings of Theology are found by asking basic questions. Previously we discussed the 'Who' of Germanic Faith and in this interview we discuss the 'Where.'
I want to thank our guests for sharing their research, thoughts and theories. Stay tuned to www.group-telegram.com/Pagan_Revivalism for more shows and interviews going deep into ancient faiths and ways!
Gods Love You!
Chapter 1
0:00:00 - 0:07:38
Introductions and origins of Germanic Cosmology
Chapter 2
0:07:39 - 1:47:35
Elements of Germanic Cosmology
Chapter 3
1:47:36 - 1:55:27
Putting it all Together
Chapter 4
1:55:28 - 2:10:00
Final Statments
This is a sequel and companion interview to the Who are the Gods of Germania returning with author & researcher William P. Reaves and the scholars at The Norrœna Society, Mark Puryear and Kyle Davis.
Sometimes the most profound findings of Theology are found by asking basic questions. Previously we discussed the 'Who' of Germanic Faith and in this interview we discuss the 'Where.'
I want to thank our guests for sharing their research, thoughts and theories. Stay tuned to www.group-telegram.com/Pagan_Revivalism for more shows and interviews going deep into ancient faiths and ways!
Gods Love You!
Chapter 1
0:00:00 - 0:07:38
Introductions and origins of Germanic Cosmology
Chapter 2
0:07:39 - 1:47:35
Elements of Germanic Cosmology
Chapter 3
1:47:36 - 1:55:27
Putting it all Together
Chapter 4
1:55:28 - 2:10:00
Final Statments
Peasant is superstitious, but apathetic towards religion…To clear his conscience he follows all the rituals with superficial precision; he goes to the church on Sundays just to not think about it for the next six days. He despises priests and considers them greedy loafers who live off him. The heroes of all obscene folklore and songs, the butts of all jokes and objects of scorn are always a priests and his wife.
Alexander Herzen XIXth century writer
Alexander Herzen XIXth century writer
If you are messaged by the channel keep in mind that it’s a bot shilling some bitcoin or whatever. I only message people from my personal account.
Plutarch notes in his Life of Agesilaus that the Spartans customarily brought their dead kings’ bodies back to Sparta, preserved in wax or honey, and that this was the treatment given to Agesilaus upon his death. The Spartans sought to bring back the body of the king in good shape, at which point the lavish burial ceremonies would take place. Presumably the king’s body would need to be preserved for the purpose of being carried out on a couch with fair coverings.
Nicholas R. Granitz
Nicholas R. Granitz
There’s a theory that Zbruch idol is a modern fake made by a 19th c. Polish poet who supposedly based its iconography on Romantic imagery of medieval Europe. The idol’s surprisingly well-preserved condition is another argument. This theory, as interesting as it is, doesn’t take into account what we know about ancient Slavic idols. Yes, Zbruch idol is relatively unique because it’s one of the last Pagan idols created. In fact, it wasn’t even finished by the time the conversion happened and the idol was hidden to keep it safe. This is part of the reason why it was preserved so well. The other is the fact that it wasn’t submerged underwater for that long which counters the second argument.
On the topic of iconography of the idol we can see that it sharer plenty of elements with other, much less-known ones found throughout Eastern, Central and even part of the Western Europe where Slavic tribes (used to) live. The hat, the position of the arms, the cornucopia and the ring of the Goddesses and the sword of one of the male ones are widespread too.
Another thing to consider is the fact that a 19th century poet would have commissioned a drastically different depiction of Slavic Gods considering how artists interpreted the descriptions e.g. dressing them in anachronistic late medieval clothes and making the statues look anatomically realistic just like Greek and Roman ones which was most likely not the case with real ancient Slavic idols.
The gods were, in a sense, literally present in their sanctuaries. Greeks constantly, in documents and contexts of very different kinds, referred to what we would call a statue of a particular god simply by that god’s name; in representations on vases of scenes set in temples, it is often unclear whether we are looking at a statue or at an actual god. To be sure, they knew that statues were made by craftsmen from physical materials; and plain statements that statues are gods, or that gods are statues, are not to be found.
R.Parker
R.Parker