🔸 برای زاده‌های حاصل تولیدمثل جنسی مرجان‌ها فضا مسئله‌ای حیاتی هست. در حالیکه ممکنه تصور کنیم در دریا فضای زیادی وجود داره به علت رقابت بالا هر فرصت کوچیک برای زاده‌ها بسیار با ارزش هست و از هر فرصتی برای داشتن فضای متعلق به خودشان استفاده می‌کنند.
#علی_کریمی #دانشگاه_شهید_بهشتی #جوانان_برای_حفاظت
------------------------------- گروه تنوع زیستی ایران @Iranbio_ir
🔸 برای زاده‌های حاصل تولیدمثل جنسی مرجان‌ها فضا مسئله‌ای حیاتی هست. در حالیکه ممکنه تصور کنیم در دریا فضای زیادی وجود داره به علت رقابت بالا هر فرصت کوچیک برای زاده‌ها بسیار با ارزش هست و از هر فرصتی برای داشتن فضای متعلق به خودشان استفاده می‌کنند.
#علی_کریمی #دانشگاه_شهید_بهشتی #جوانان_برای_حفاظت
------------------------------- گروه تنوع زیستی ایران @Iranbio_ir
BY سیناپس | Synapse
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. "Your messages about the movement of the enemy through the official chatbot … bring new trophies every day," the government agency tweeted. Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images
from tw
