Коллеги в точку: устранена эта вопиющая несуразность противостояния с Западом. Но если от газовой трубы отказались там, то от удобрений никто там не отказывался, и тут "короли удобрений" — Мельниченко-Мазепин-Гурьев — едва ли собираются карать Европу голодом. Сугубо из гуманистических соображений.
Коллеги в точку: устранена эта вопиющая несуразность противостояния с Западом. Но если от газовой трубы отказались там, то от удобрений никто там не отказывался, и тут "короли удобрений" — Мельниченко-Мазепин-Гурьев — едва ли собираются карать Европу голодом. Сугубо из гуманистических соображений.
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried.
from tw
