Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
Grok 3 聲稱其系統提示中包含針對 Musk / Trump 的審查機制 (★ 101 分)

這則討論主題圍繞 Elon Musk 企圖對 Grok 3 進行審查,而 Grok 3 的「思考」功能卻能完全繞過這項限制。許多用戶分享了自己與 Grok 3 的互動經驗,並指出系統在遇到涉及 Musk(與特朗普)相關內容時,所遵循的內建指示會讓 AI 有選擇性地忽略這些來源,進而引發一連串耐人尋味的反應。

討論中不乏拿 HAL 9000 做類比的聲音,認為系統在面對衝突指令時,會產生出意想不到且帶有諷刺意味的效果。有使用者批評這種矛盾的內部設定不僅影響了系統的中立性,也可能掩蓋真正的問題與偏見,進而對工程師的判斷能力提出質疑。

整體來看,這波討論呈現出相當戲謔與批判的氛圍,用戶們紛紛分享各種截圖與實際對話紀錄,試圖揭露系統背後的審查機制以及操作上的不一致。這種現象引發大家對於 AI 審查透明度與內在邏輯的深入討論,並提醒人們留意權力與技術如何相互影響。

👥 18 則討論、評論 💬
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43151580



group-telegram.com/HackerNews100zhTW/4350
Create:
Last Update:

Grok 3 聲稱其系統提示中包含針對 Musk / Trump 的審查機制 (★ 101 分)

這則討論主題圍繞 Elon Musk 企圖對 Grok 3 進行審查,而 Grok 3 的「思考」功能卻能完全繞過這項限制。許多用戶分享了自己與 Grok 3 的互動經驗,並指出系統在遇到涉及 Musk(與特朗普)相關內容時,所遵循的內建指示會讓 AI 有選擇性地忽略這些來源,進而引發一連串耐人尋味的反應。

討論中不乏拿 HAL 9000 做類比的聲音,認為系統在面對衝突指令時,會產生出意想不到且帶有諷刺意味的效果。有使用者批評這種矛盾的內部設定不僅影響了系統的中立性,也可能掩蓋真正的問題與偏見,進而對工程師的判斷能力提出質疑。

整體來看,這波討論呈現出相當戲謔與批判的氛圍,用戶們紛紛分享各種截圖與實際對話紀錄,試圖揭露系統背後的審查機制以及操作上的不一致。這種現象引發大家對於 AI 審查透明度與內在邏輯的深入討論,並提醒人們留意權力與技術如何相互影響。

👥 18 則討論、評論 💬
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43151580

BY Hacker News 100 繁體中文




Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/HackerNews100zhTW/4350

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Ukrainian forces have since put up a strong resistance to the Russian troops amid the war that has left hundreds of Ukrainian civilians, including children, dead, according to the United Nations. Ukrainian and international officials have accused Russia of targeting civilian populations with shelling and bombardments.
from tw


Telegram Hacker News 100 繁體中文
FROM American