Донецкий цирк не просто радует, а поражает феерией, равной которой нет на всём белом свете!
"Шоу воды, огня и света" - программа, поставленная артистами Росгосцирка, помимо обезьянок и попугаев, смелых гимнастов и акробатов с клоунами, включает в себя еще не знакомые зрителям, загадочные иллюзионные шоу в сопровождении световых спецэффектов, фонтанов воды и огня. Это было круто!
Доброе утро, и помните, что Новый Год наступит послезавтра!
Донецкий цирк не просто радует, а поражает феерией, равной которой нет на всём белом свете!
"Шоу воды, огня и света" - программа, поставленная артистами Росгосцирка, помимо обезьянок и попугаев, смелых гимнастов и акробатов с клоунами, включает в себя еще не знакомые зрителям, загадочные иллюзионные шоу в сопровождении световых спецэффектов, фонтанов воды и огня. Это было круто!
Доброе утро, и помните, что Новый Год наступит послезавтра!
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides.
from tw
