في هذه المناسبة التي هي ذكرى سنوية، دائمًا نركِّز فيها على تخليد ذكرى الشهداء، والحديث عنهم، والحديث عن سيرهم، وعن عطائهم؛ باعتبارهم مدرسة نموذجية تقدِّم لنا وتجسِّد لنا قيم الإسلام ومبادئه.
في هذه المناسبة التي هي ذكرى سنوية، دائمًا نركِّز فيها على تخليد ذكرى الشهداء، والحديث عنهم، والحديث عن سيرهم، وعن عطائهم؛ باعتبارهم مدرسة نموذجية تقدِّم لنا وتجسِّد لنا قيم الإسلام ومبادئه.
Telegram was co-founded by Pavel and Nikolai Durov, the brothers who had previously created VKontakte. VK is Russia’s equivalent of Facebook, a social network used for public and private messaging, audio and video sharing as well as online gaming. In January, SimpleWeb reported that VK was Russia’s fourth most-visited website, after Yandex, YouTube and Google’s Russian-language homepage. In 2016, Forbes’ Michael Solomon described Pavel Durov (pictured, below) as the “Mark Zuckerberg of Russia.” You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from tw
