Любой, призывающий к созданию неких ополчений в приграничных областях, и при этом отказывающий им в праве иметь оружие на руках (именно на руках, а не "на складе, выдадут при необходимости") есть мразь, дегенерат и/или украинский шпион. От таких безоружных "ополчений" лучше держаться подальше.
Любой, призывающий к созданию неких ополчений в приграничных областях, и при этом отказывающий им в праве иметь оружие на руках (именно на руках, а не "на складе, выдадут при необходимости") есть мразь, дегенерат и/или украинский шпион. От таких безоружных "ополчений" лучше держаться подальше.
BY Слаанеш и повседневность
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Continuing its crackdown against entities allegedly involved in a front-running scam using messaging app Telegram, Sebi on Thursday carried out search and seizure operations at the premises of eight entities in multiple locations across the country. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. "He has kind of an old-school cyber-libertarian world view where technology is there to set you free," Maréchal said.
from tw
