По предварительной информации, преступники, захватившие заложников в СИЗО требуют машину, оружие и возможность уехать из изолятора.
В этом случае они готовы, по их словам, отпустить заложников.
В настоящий момент в сторону ростовского СИЗО выдвинулся ОМОН.
В свою очередь, во ФСИН России сообщили, что в связи с чрезвычайным происшествием в СИЗО-1 ГУФСИН России по Ростовской области в регион незамедлительно выехала группа сотрудников центрального аппарата ФСИН.
По предварительной информации, преступники, захватившие заложников в СИЗО требуют машину, оружие и возможность уехать из изолятора.
В этом случае они готовы, по их словам, отпустить заложников.
В настоящий момент в сторону ростовского СИЗО выдвинулся ОМОН.
В свою очередь, во ФСИН России сообщили, что в связи с чрезвычайным происшествием в СИЗО-1 ГУФСИН России по Ростовской области в регион незамедлительно выехала группа сотрудников центрального аппарата ФСИН.
It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists." He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised.
from tw
