🎙Депутат Госдумы Координатор🇷🇺🇷🇺Евгений Фёдоров в прямом эфире Национального Курса в 20:00, Обсуждаем самые острые вопросы по текущим событиям в стране и мире, Присоединяйтесь по ссылкам👉
🎙Депутат Госдумы Координатор🇷🇺🇷🇺Евгений Фёдоров в прямом эфире Национального Курса в 20:00, Обсуждаем самые острые вопросы по текущим событиям в стране и мире, Присоединяйтесь по ссылкам👉
Perpetrators of such fraud use various marketing techniques to attract subscribers on their social media channels. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice.
from tw
