«Политбарометр» от ZDF, репрезентативный опрос немцев, обещает победу Камалы Харрис.
Примечательно, что это не вопрос предпочтений с формулировкой «Кто вам более симпатичен?», а именно вопрос о шансах «Кто победит на президентских выборах в США?».
Поэтому неадекватный результат — 72% против 23% — говорит не столько о политических симпатиях немцев, сколько о качестве экспертизы местных американистов и ангажированности медиаландшафта.
«Политбарометр» от ZDF, репрезентативный опрос немцев, обещает победу Камалы Харрис.
Примечательно, что это не вопрос предпочтений с формулировкой «Кто вам более симпатичен?», а именно вопрос о шансах «Кто победит на президентских выборах в США?».
Поэтому неадекватный результат — 72% против 23% — говорит не столько о политических симпатиях немцев, сколько о качестве экспертизы местных американистов и ангажированности медиаландшафта.
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. "Someone posing as a Ukrainian citizen just joins the chat and starts spreading misinformation, or gathers data, like the location of shelters," Tsekhanovska said, noting how false messages have urged Ukrainians to turn off their phones at a specific time of night, citing cybersafety. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups.
from tw
