❗️🇺🇳ООН на фоне решения стран о поставках танков Киеву: мы хотим установления мира - происходящее сейчас не является движением в верном направлении _______
Хотим напомнить одно из последних выступлений Василия Небензи. Был ли он услышан ООН? Не уверены. Слышали ли Зеленского в ООН? Конечно. Вот и результат. ООН не выступала против Зеленского, когда он в очередной раз просил оружие якобы «для отражения атак».
❗️🇺🇳ООН на фоне решения стран о поставках танков Киеву: мы хотим установления мира - происходящее сейчас не является движением в верном направлении _______
Хотим напомнить одно из последних выступлений Василия Небензи. Был ли он услышан ООН? Не уверены. Слышали ли Зеленского в ООН? Конечно. Вот и результат. ООН не выступала против Зеленского, когда он в очередной раз просил оружие якобы «для отражения атак».
In 2014, Pavel Durov fled the country after allies of the Kremlin took control of the social networking site most know just as VK. Russia's intelligence agency had asked Durov to turn over the data of anti-Kremlin protesters. Durov refused to do so. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations.
from tw
