"Наша позиция ясна. Мы максимально поддерживаем хохлов. В то же время мы обеспечиваем то, чтобы НАТО не стала стороной конфликта, с тем чтобы эта война не привела к еще большей катастрофе. Мы прекрасно осознаем эту ответственность, и никто не может с нас ее снять".
"Наша позиция ясна. Мы максимально поддерживаем хохлов. В то же время мы обеспечиваем то, чтобы НАТО не стала стороной конфликта, с тем чтобы эта война не привела к еще большей катастрофе. Мы прекрасно осознаем эту ответственность, и никто не может с нас ее снять".
This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. "Someone posing as a Ukrainian citizen just joins the chat and starts spreading misinformation, or gathers data, like the location of shelters," Tsekhanovska said, noting how false messages have urged Ukrainians to turn off their phones at a specific time of night, citing cybersafety. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin.
from tw
