🎥 التقى المحاضر بالمشتركين من برنامج قراءة نصية (المرحلة الأولى :كتاب التدمرية) في اللقاء التفاعلي السادس تدارس معهم وأجاب عن التساؤلات والاستشكالات المباشرة من المشتركين و الواردة عبر نموذج الأسئلة.✨
🎥 التقى المحاضر بالمشتركين من برنامج قراءة نصية (المرحلة الأولى :كتاب التدمرية) في اللقاء التفاعلي السادس تدارس معهم وأجاب عن التساؤلات والاستشكالات المباشرة من المشتركين و الواردة عبر نموذج الأسئلة.✨
DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. "The result is on this photo: fiery 'greetings' to the invaders," the Security Service of Ukraine wrote alongside a photo showing several military vehicles among plumes of black smoke.
from tw
