Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 6944 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Байки из Спасской Башни | Telegram Webview: kremlin_bashnya/47392 -
"Родителями двигают странные мотивы. Какие еще черепашки-ниндзя? У нас есть богатыри, известные былинные витязи! Добрыня, Алёша, Илья, Святогор. Вот хорошие имена".
Виталий Милонов, депутат Госдумы от "Единой России"
"Родителями двигают странные мотивы. Какие еще черепашки-ниндзя? У нас есть богатыри, известные былинные витязи! Добрыня, Алёша, Илья, Святогор. Вот хорошие имена".
Виталий Милонов, депутат Госдумы от "Единой России"
BY Байки из Спасской Башни
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. The channel appears to be part of the broader information war that has developed following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The Kremlin has paid Russian TikTok influencers to push propaganda, according to a Vice News investigation, while ProPublica found that fake Russian fact check videos had been viewed over a million times on Telegram. Telegram was founded in 2013 by two Russian brothers, Nikolai and Pavel Durov. The regulator took order for the search and seizure operation from Judge Purushottam B Jadhav, Sebi Special Judge / Additional Sessions Judge. Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities.
from tw