"Вывозил людей из соседней деревни в безопасное место. Ехал на своей Ниве, заметил коптер. Первый раз он не догнал меня. Второй раз ударил в машину. Пришлось бросить ее и бежать.
У друга был похожий случай. Он помогал эвакуировать пожилых на личном авто, — его тоже догнал дрон и ударил по капоту и по колесам. Он тоже вынужден был оставить машину и бежать."
"Вывозил людей из соседней деревни в безопасное место. Ехал на своей Ниве, заметил коптер. Первый раз он не догнал меня. Второй раз ударил в машину. Пришлось бросить ее и бежать.
У друга был похожий случай. Он помогал эвакуировать пожилых на личном авто, — его тоже догнал дрон и ударил по капоту и по колесам. Он тоже вынужден был оставить машину и бежать."
Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. "Someone posing as a Ukrainian citizen just joins the chat and starts spreading misinformation, or gathers data, like the location of shelters," Tsekhanovska said, noting how false messages have urged Ukrainians to turn off their phones at a specific time of night, citing cybersafety. Two days after Russia invaded Ukraine, an account on the Telegram messaging platform posing as President Volodymyr Zelenskiy urged his armed forces to surrender. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences.
from tw
