Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
В 1960 г., следуя общеамериканскому курсу на удвоение нажитого, известная нам американская ассоциация производителей фанеры (Douglas Fir Plywood Association) выпустила брошюру, в которой постулировала, что каждой семье требуется два дома: «один для жизни в будние дни, а второй – для истинного отдыха». Одним из вариантов второго жилища, предлагавшихся читателям и реализованных при помощи фанеры, был дом на берегу пролива Хейла в штате Вашингтон, спроектированный известным нам Хенриком Буллом, перед которым была поставлена задача «построить загородный дом по цене второго автомобиля».

Булл и этот дополнительный дом площадью 90 кв. м. разделил на два блока: общий, с кухней и гостиной, и частный, с двумя спальнями и санузлом. Терраса, соединявшая оба блока, была перекрыта двускатной крышей, матерчатая кровля которой легко сворачивалась, и могла использоваться в качестве мангальной зоны или даже для размещения гостей (правда, в спальных мешках). А собрать такой дом без утепления и установки септика стоило 3 200 долларов, что составляло примерно половину от среднего семейного дохода за год.

P.S. С другими проектами летних домов из фанеры можно ознакомиться по этой ссылке: https://archive.org/details/SecondHomesForLeisureLiving/mode/2up

———

In 1960, when the American nation was busy doubling their real estate and other assets, Douglas Fir Plywood Association published a promotional booklet and postulated that “every family needs two homes! …one for the work week, the other for pure pleasure”. The booklet featured eighteen remarkable plywood cabins including one designed by Henrik Bull and built in Hale Passage, Washington.

Interestingly, Bull, whom we already know from a couple of other cabin designs and who was tasked with building a cabin “for the cost of a second car”, opted for splitting this 90 sq. m. second home into two units, one with private quarters (two bedrooms and a bathroom) and the other with a kitchen and living room. The sundeck that connected the units was covered with a convertible pitch roof made of canvas and was to include a barbecue area and accommodate additional guests in sleeping bags, if necessary. The cost of assembling this second home (albeit with no insulation or septic tank) amounted to USD 3,200 which translated into half of an average annual family income in 1960.

P.S. Other designs in this booklet, which are just as inspiring, can be found here: https://archive.org/details/SecondHomesForLeisureLiving/mode/2up

(photos: Flickr user MidCentArc, archive.org, grainedit.com, tahoequarterly.com)



group-telegram.com/midcenturymodern/16890
Create:
Last Update:

В 1960 г., следуя общеамериканскому курсу на удвоение нажитого, известная нам американская ассоциация производителей фанеры (Douglas Fir Plywood Association) выпустила брошюру, в которой постулировала, что каждой семье требуется два дома: «один для жизни в будние дни, а второй – для истинного отдыха». Одним из вариантов второго жилища, предлагавшихся читателям и реализованных при помощи фанеры, был дом на берегу пролива Хейла в штате Вашингтон, спроектированный известным нам Хенриком Буллом, перед которым была поставлена задача «построить загородный дом по цене второго автомобиля».

Булл и этот дополнительный дом площадью 90 кв. м. разделил на два блока: общий, с кухней и гостиной, и частный, с двумя спальнями и санузлом. Терраса, соединявшая оба блока, была перекрыта двускатной крышей, матерчатая кровля которой легко сворачивалась, и могла использоваться в качестве мангальной зоны или даже для размещения гостей (правда, в спальных мешках). А собрать такой дом без утепления и установки септика стоило 3 200 долларов, что составляло примерно половину от среднего семейного дохода за год.

P.S. С другими проектами летних домов из фанеры можно ознакомиться по этой ссылке: https://archive.org/details/SecondHomesForLeisureLiving/mode/2up

———

In 1960, when the American nation was busy doubling their real estate and other assets, Douglas Fir Plywood Association published a promotional booklet and postulated that “every family needs two homes! …one for the work week, the other for pure pleasure”. The booklet featured eighteen remarkable plywood cabins including one designed by Henrik Bull and built in Hale Passage, Washington.

Interestingly, Bull, whom we already know from a couple of other cabin designs and who was tasked with building a cabin “for the cost of a second car”, opted for splitting this 90 sq. m. second home into two units, one with private quarters (two bedrooms and a bathroom) and the other with a kitchen and living room. The sundeck that connected the units was covered with a convertible pitch roof made of canvas and was to include a barbecue area and accommodate additional guests in sleeping bags, if necessary. The cost of assembling this second home (albeit with no insulation or septic tank) amounted to USD 3,200 which translated into half of an average annual family income in 1960.

P.S. Other designs in this booklet, which are just as inspiring, can be found here: https://archive.org/details/SecondHomesForLeisureLiving/mode/2up

(photos: Flickr user MidCentArc, archive.org, grainedit.com, tahoequarterly.com)

BY Mid-Century, More Than











Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/midcenturymodern/16890

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

Russian President Vladimir Putin launched Russia's invasion of Ukraine in the early-morning hours of February 24, targeting several key cities with military strikes. Pavel Durov, Telegram's CEO, is known as "the Russian Mark Zuckerberg," for co-founding VKontakte, which is Russian for "in touch," a Facebook imitator that became the country's most popular social networking site. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. "The result is on this photo: fiery 'greetings' to the invaders," the Security Service of Ukraine wrote alongside a photo showing several military vehicles among plumes of black smoke. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations.
from tw


Telegram Mid-Century, More Than
FROM American