Инфляция продолжает расти, Центробанк повышает ключевую ставку, рубль обесценивается. А недавно еще начались разговоры о возможной заморозке банковских вкладов. В такой ситуации вновь и вновь возникает вопрос, как сохранить свои сбережения.
🔖Наши коллеги из @news_72ru задали вопросы экспертам, которые рассказали об имеющихся инструментах.
Инфляция продолжает расти, Центробанк повышает ключевую ставку, рубль обесценивается. А недавно еще начались разговоры о возможной заморозке банковских вкладов. В такой ситуации вновь и вновь возникает вопрос, как сохранить свои сбережения.
🔖Наши коллеги из @news_72ru задали вопросы экспертам, которые рассказали об имеющихся инструментах.
In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. In February 2014, the Ukrainian people ousted pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych, prompting Russia to invade and annex the Crimean peninsula. By the start of April, Pavel Durov had given his notice, with TechCrunch saying at the time that the CEO had resisted pressure to suppress pages criticizing the Russian government. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. "He has kind of an old-school cyber-libertarian world view where technology is there to set you free," Maréchal said. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from tw
