Монгайт пьет валерьянку и раздавлена. Заметьте, в геноцид русских в Донбассе вся эта патриота не верила. А в фейк про Бучу верит сразу и безоговорочно.
Вопрос, вопрос - сумасшедшие с каплями или за деньги?
Монгайт пьет валерьянку и раздавлена. Заметьте, в геноцид русских в Донбассе вся эта патриота не верила. А в фейк про Бучу верит сразу и безоговорочно.
Вопрос, вопрос - сумасшедшие с каплями или за деньги?
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. "There is a significant risk of insider threat or hacking of Telegram systems that could expose all of these chats to the Russian government," said Eva Galperin with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which has called for Telegram to improve its privacy practices. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. "There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said. In a message on his Telegram channel recently recounting the episode, Durov wrote: "I lost my company and my home, but would do it again – without hesitation."
from tw
