Когда ВСУ потеряют Малую и Казачью Локню, наступит крах их обороны на Курском направлении. Об этом военкору RT Владу Андрице @vandrytsa рассказал командир артдивизиона 52-й бригады ВДВ с позывным Кавказ. По его словам, после этого продвижение наших войск пойдёт легче. У противника останется подвоз только из Сумской области, часть дорог которой уже попадает под наш огневой контроль.
На 00:09 — Малая Локня сейчас оплот, за который вэсэушники пытаются грызться всеми силами.
На 01:05 — военные РФ одним снарядом уничтожили две машины вэсэушников. #ВоенкорыRT
Когда ВСУ потеряют Малую и Казачью Локню, наступит крах их обороны на Курском направлении. Об этом военкору RT Владу Андрице @vandrytsa рассказал командир артдивизиона 52-й бригады ВДВ с позывным Кавказ. По его словам, после этого продвижение наших войск пойдёт легче. У противника останется подвоз только из Сумской области, часть дорог которой уже попадает под наш огневой контроль.
На 00:09 — Малая Локня сейчас оплот, за который вэсэушники пытаются грызться всеми силами.
На 01:05 — военные РФ одним снарядом уничтожили две машины вэсэушников. #ВоенкорыRT
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. "He has kind of an old-school cyber-libertarian world view where technology is there to set you free," Maréchal said. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy."
from tw
