«Около 1404 года умерла на Ране (о. Рюген - прим.) в Ясмонде старуха по имени Голицына; она и ее муж были последние, которые на Ране умели говорить по-славянски».
Поморский хронист Томас Канцов, первая половина XVI в.
«Около 1404 года умерла на Ране (о. Рюген - прим.) в Ясмонде старуха по имени Голицына; она и ее муж были последние, которые на Ране умели говорить по-славянски».
Поморский хронист Томас Канцов, первая половина XVI в.
Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever."
from tw
