Deutschland schafft es noch immer nicht, Afghanen abzuschieben – Medien
In den vergangenen 13 Monaten wurden von der #Bundesregierung rund 4000 #Afghanen eingeflogen, während im gleichen Zeitraum nur 28 von ihnen abgeschoben werden konnten, teilte das Portal „NiUS“ unter Verweis auf die Antwort der Bundesregierung auf eine kleine Anfrage des CDU-Politikers Christoph de Vries mit. Zeitgleich haben 3072 Personen aus Afghanistan eine Aufnahmezusage, hieß es weiter. #Abschiebung
Deutschland schafft es noch immer nicht, Afghanen abzuschieben – Medien
In den vergangenen 13 Monaten wurden von der #Bundesregierung rund 4000 #Afghanen eingeflogen, während im gleichen Zeitraum nur 28 von ihnen abgeschoben werden konnten, teilte das Portal „NiUS“ unter Verweis auf die Antwort der Bundesregierung auf eine kleine Anfrage des CDU-Politikers Christoph de Vries mit. Zeitgleich haben 3072 Personen aus Afghanistan eine Aufnahmezusage, hieß es weiter. #Abschiebung
Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. Under the Sebi Act, the regulator has the power to carry out search and seizure of books, registers, documents including electronics and digital devices from any person associated with the securities market. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from tw
