🕳️Моя любимая мини-субкультурка — молодые российские диггеры
У них адски красивые блоги, эти СМЕЛЬЧАКИ именно что заэстетизировали коллекторы, спецодежду, водопадики, тёмные тоннели с мутной водой и яичницу с грибами, выросшими в канализации. Есть в контенте диггеров что–то лиминальное и седативное 😇
Когда-нибудь я переборю страх захлебнуться в коллекторе из-за резкого подъёма воды и запишусь к ребятам на экскурсию. Пока просто наблюдаю и восторгаюсь.
🕳️Моя любимая мини-субкультурка — молодые российские диггеры
У них адски красивые блоги, эти СМЕЛЬЧАКИ именно что заэстетизировали коллекторы, спецодежду, водопадики, тёмные тоннели с мутной водой и яичницу с грибами, выросшими в канализации. Есть в контенте диггеров что–то лиминальное и седативное 😇
Когда-нибудь я переборю страх захлебнуться в коллекторе из-за резкого подъёма воды и запишусь к ребятам на экскурсию. Пока просто наблюдаю и восторгаюсь.
Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals.
from tw
