Алкашня / синеботы за рулём — второй бич смертности на дорогах после скорости. Тут вообще никаких оправданий быть не может в принципе. Сажать надолго, разорять экономически до трусов и рассказывать на каждом углу. Чтобы понимали, что нет никакого смысла бухим за руль садиться: вызови такси / останься в гостях и т.д.
Это такая же управляемая история как и скорость. И вот тут ГИБДД хвалю — их методы дают результат, хотя, можно и нужно жёстче и быстрей.
Друг хочет сесть пьяный за руль — запрети / забери ключи и будешь молодец!
Алкашня / синеботы за рулём — второй бич смертности на дорогах после скорости. Тут вообще никаких оправданий быть не может в принципе. Сажать надолго, разорять экономически до трусов и рассказывать на каждом углу. Чтобы понимали, что нет никакого смысла бухим за руль садиться: вызови такси / останься в гостях и т.д.
Это такая же управляемая история как и скорость. И вот тут ГИБДД хвалю — их методы дают результат, хотя, можно и нужно жёстче и быстрей.
Друг хочет сесть пьяный за руль — запрети / забери ключи и будешь молодец!
К.А.
BY СпецДорПроект
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. The Russian invasion of Ukraine has been a driving force in markets for the past few weeks.
from tw
