Warning: file_put_contents(aCache/aDaily/post/ssternenko/--): Failed to open stream: Permission denied in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 STERNENKO | Telegram Webview: ssternenko/34614 -
Цієї ночі в окупованій Феодосії дронами влучили не у звичайну нафтобазу, а у важливий для росіян перевалочний вузол — нафтоналивний порт, який може цілий рік приймати танкери з нафтопродуктами, зберігати їх та постачати на весь окупований Крим.
У разі серйозних пошкоджень, логістика нафтопродуктів в окупованому Криму буде більше переведена на залізницю та автомобільні дороги, що сильно ускладнить її.
Цієї ночі в окупованій Феодосії дронами влучили не у звичайну нафтобазу, а у важливий для росіян перевалочний вузол — нафтоналивний порт, який може цілий рік приймати танкери з нафтопродуктами, зберігати їх та постачати на весь окупований Крим.
У разі серйозних пошкоджень, логістика нафтопродуктів в окупованому Криму буде більше переведена на залізницю та автомобільні дороги, що сильно ускладнить її.
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough
from tw
