А еще со мной недавно случился прямой эфир на «Радио Маяк». Рита Митрофанова пригласила меня в программу «Физики и лирики» поговорить про женские дневники и письма.
Получилось немного нервно из-за проблем со связью, а еще я мучительно пыталась понять кого назвать из известных писательниц XIX века и почему-то мой мозг решил рассказать о Тэффи, а не об Анастасии Вербицкой, наверное, потому что последнюю точно мало кто читает и знает сейчас, но в целом я довольна получившимся разговором✨
А еще со мной недавно случился прямой эфир на «Радио Маяк». Рита Митрофанова пригласила меня в программу «Физики и лирики» поговорить про женские дневники и письма.
Получилось немного нервно из-за проблем со связью, а еще я мучительно пыталась понять кого назвать из известных писательниц XIX века и почему-то мой мозг решил рассказать о Тэффи, а не об Анастасии Вербицкой, наверное, потому что последнюю точно мало кто читает и знает сейчас, но в целом я довольна получившимся разговором✨
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform.
from tw
