▶️ Путин посмотрел результаты обработки ИИ GigaChat вопросов, поступающих на прямую линию.
Президенту рассказали, что эта нейросеть от "Сбера" позволяет буквально за секунды обрабатывать обращения на прямую линию — то, на что раньше уходили целые месяцы уже после самой программы.
▶️ Путин посмотрел результаты обработки ИИ GigaChat вопросов, поступающих на прямую линию.
Президенту рассказали, что эта нейросеть от "Сбера" позволяет буквально за секунды обрабатывать обращения на прямую линию — то, на что раньше уходили целые месяцы уже после самой программы.
Видео: Kremlin. ru
BY ТАСС
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from tw
