Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 12741 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Терриконы Донбасса | Telegram Webview: terrikony_donbassa/33872 -
Я, как любой настоящий неонашист очень люблю иногда всматриваться в бэк тех или иных творческих деятелей, артистов и так далее, в поисках морального удовлетворения от преподнесения этого добра публике. В этот раз в моё поле зрения попал многоуважаемые GSPD и Dead Blonde. Читайте, наслаждайтесь.
Я, как любой настоящий неонашист очень люблю иногда всматриваться в бэк тех или иных творческих деятелей, артистов и так далее, в поисках морального удовлетворения от преподнесения этого добра публике. В этот раз в моё поле зрения попал многоуважаемые GSPD и Dead Blonde. Читайте, наслаждайтесь.
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. That hurt tech stocks. For the past few weeks, the 10-year yield has traded between 1.72% and 2%, as traders moved into the bond for safety when Russia headlines were ugly—and out of it when headlines improved. Now, the yield is touching its pandemic-era high. If the yield breaks above that level, that could signal that it’s on a sustainable path higher. Higher long-dated bond yields make future profits less valuable—and many tech companies are valued on the basis of profits forecast for many years in the future. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever."
from tw
