Всё-таки гений - исключительное дело. Обратите внимание на лаконичность и ясность мысли.
Для тех, кому лень: 2005 год, Adobe нанимает людей из Apple, одного уже наняли, ещё многих переманивают. Стив Джобс пишет об этом письмо директору Adobe, где говорит, что у него политика - не нанимать из Adobe (высшая степень дружбы между компаниями). Но, раз у Adobe подход другой, один из них политику должен поменять.
К такому надо стремиться: сколько стиля и власти в скромном "please let me know who".
Upd. Против Adobe и Apple было дело по этому поводу - наверное, так и стало доступным письмо, потому что document production.
And in the past few years, the DOJ brought three civil enforcement actions against technology companies (eBay and Intuit, Lucasfilm and Pixar, and Adobe, Apple, Google, Intel, Intuit, and Pixar) that entered into “no poach” agreements with competitors. In all three cases, the competitors agreed not to cold call each other’s employees. In two cases, at least one company also agreed to limit its hiring of employees who currently worked at a competitor.
All three cases ended in consent judgments against the technology companies.
Всё-таки гений - исключительное дело. Обратите внимание на лаконичность и ясность мысли.
Для тех, кому лень: 2005 год, Adobe нанимает людей из Apple, одного уже наняли, ещё многих переманивают. Стив Джобс пишет об этом письмо директору Adobe, где говорит, что у него политика - не нанимать из Adobe (высшая степень дружбы между компаниями). Но, раз у Adobe подход другой, один из них политику должен поменять.
К такому надо стремиться: сколько стиля и власти в скромном "please let me know who".
Upd. Против Adobe и Apple было дело по этому поводу - наверное, так и стало доступным письмо, потому что document production.
And in the past few years, the DOJ brought three civil enforcement actions against technology companies (eBay and Intuit, Lucasfilm and Pixar, and Adobe, Apple, Google, Intel, Intuit, and Pixar) that entered into “no poach” agreements with competitors. In all three cases, the competitors agreed not to cold call each other’s employees. In two cases, at least one company also agreed to limit its hiring of employees who currently worked at a competitor.
All three cases ended in consent judgments against the technology companies.
Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough In 2014, Pavel Durov fled the country after allies of the Kremlin took control of the social networking site most know just as VK. Russia's intelligence agency had asked Durov to turn over the data of anti-Kremlin protesters. Durov refused to do so. The news also helped traders look past another report showing decades-high inflation and shake off some of the volatility from recent sessions. The Bureau of Labor Statistics' February Consumer Price Index (CPI) this week showed another surge in prices even before Russia escalated its attacks in Ukraine. The headline CPI — soaring 7.9% over last year — underscored the sticky inflationary pressures reverberating across the U.S. economy, with everything from groceries to rents and airline fares getting more expensive for everyday consumers. "Markets were cheering this economic recovery and return to strong economic growth, but the cheers will turn to tears if the inflation outbreak pushes businesses and consumers to the brink of recession," he added. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from tw
