🔹مدیرعامل شرکت ارتباطات زیرساخت آب پاکی را روی دست بهانه‌جوها ریخت و توپ رفع فیلتر را از زمین مهندسان به زمین سیاستمداران انداخت: «در حال حاضر زیرساخت‌های ارتباطی کشور آمادگی لازم برای هرگونه رفع محدودیت اینترنت را دارد.»
🔹مدیرعامل شرکت ارتباطات زیرساخت آب پاکی را روی دست بهانه‌جوها ریخت و توپ رفع فیلتر را از زمین مهندسان به زمین سیاستمداران انداخت: «در حال حاضر زیرساخت‌های ارتباطی کشور آمادگی لازم برای هرگونه رفع محدودیت اینترنت را دارد.»
Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities.
from tw
