Кто же убедил Минсельхоз, что ветеринарию можно заменить регионализацией, компартментализацией, электронной сертификацией и прочей ветеринарной профанацией? – ведь достаточно посмотреть в определение и основные задачи ветеринарии в законе Российской Федерации «О ветеринарии» и по каждой системе ФГИС ВетИС задать вопрос – какую именно задачу и каким способом решает ее эта система, и все сразу станет понятно. Задумка-то вроде и неплохая – только вот цифровизация без реальных ветеринарных дел привела к стойкому отсутствию благополучия по всем экономически и социально значимым болезням животных
Кто же убедил Минсельхоз, что ветеринарию можно заменить регионализацией, компартментализацией, электронной сертификацией и прочей ветеринарной профанацией? – ведь достаточно посмотреть в определение и основные задачи ветеринарии в законе Российской Федерации «О ветеринарии» и по каждой системе ФГИС ВетИС задать вопрос – какую именно задачу и каким способом решает ее эта система, и все сразу станет понятно. Задумка-то вроде и неплохая – только вот цифровизация без реальных ветеринарных дел привела к стойкому отсутствию благополучия по всем экономически и социально значимым болезням животных
As a result, the pandemic saw many newcomers to Telegram, including prominent anti-vaccine activists who used the app's hands-off approach to share false information on shots, a study from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue shows. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website.
from tw
