Брест: за 1 телеграм-комментарий про Лукашенко — год колонии
7 декабря Московский суд Бреста рассматривал уголовное дело против 52-летнего Владимира Лукьянчука. Его обвиняли по ч.1 ст.368 УК, т.е. в оскорблении Лукашенко.
По информации брестской "Весны", вменённый комментарий был написан в телеграм-чате "Чат бородача" 8 сентября. В сообщении Александр Григорьевич был назван словом, которое значит "балабол" (но в матерной форме).
Прокурорка Анна Горбач за это просила 1 год колонии. Судья Евгений Бреган в тот же день ровно столько и назначил.
Брест: за 1 телеграм-комментарий про Лукашенко — год колонии
7 декабря Московский суд Бреста рассматривал уголовное дело против 52-летнего Владимира Лукьянчука. Его обвиняли по ч.1 ст.368 УК, т.е. в оскорблении Лукашенко.
По информации брестской "Весны", вменённый комментарий был написан в телеграм-чате "Чат бородача" 8 сентября. В сообщении Александр Григорьевич был назван словом, которое значит "балабол" (но в матерной форме).
Прокурорка Анна Горбач за это просила 1 год колонии. Судья Евгений Бреган в тот же день ровно столько и назначил.
In December 2021, Sebi officials had conducted a search and seizure operation at the premises of certain persons carrying out similar manipulative activities through Telegram channels. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from tw
