Вспомнил в связи с историей про побирушку. В предыдущей моей локации в в Испании возле дискаунтера-супермаркета сидел нищий. Очень ухоженный и вежливый, т.к. нас видел каждый день, то денег не просил, здоровался. Завтракал в кафешке рядом, если видел там меня с дитем, то угощал ее печенькой. Приезжал каждое утро на машине, парковал ее и шел на работу. В прошлом году встретил его у уже у высорангового супермаркета Мендоса (местная маленькая сеть одной из самых известных виноделен Аликанте) Видимо получил должность за выслугу лет:)
Вспомнил в связи с историей про побирушку. В предыдущей моей локации в в Испании возле дискаунтера-супермаркета сидел нищий. Очень ухоженный и вежливый, т.к. нас видел каждый день, то денег не просил, здоровался. Завтракал в кафешке рядом, если видел там меня с дитем, то угощал ее печенькой. Приезжал каждое утро на машине, парковал ее и шел на работу. В прошлом году встретил его у уже у высорангового супермаркета Мендоса (местная маленькая сеть одной из самых известных виноделен Аликанте) Видимо получил должность за выслугу лет:)
BY Winelawyers
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Under the Sebi Act, the regulator has the power to carry out search and seizure of books, registers, documents including electronics and digital devices from any person associated with the securities market. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from tw
