Вот поэтому, наверное, столь пристально и смотрит на Африку "долгое государство Путина". На лакуну которого (в т.ч. в отношении "долготы") как бы намекает репост нашего с вами уважаемого коллеги КбБ. Надеемся прочитать в продолжении, анонсированном репостнутым автором коммента.
Вот поэтому, наверное, столь пристально и смотрит на Африку "долгое государство Путина". На лакуну которого (в т.ч. в отношении "долготы") как бы намекает репост нашего с вами уважаемого коллеги КбБ. Надеемся прочитать в продолжении, анонсированном репостнутым автором коммента.
BY Спец по специям
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Perpetrators of such fraud use various marketing techniques to attract subscribers on their social media channels. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from ua