Кстати, да, тут еще и настойчивый ответ президентским критикам: мол, соцстрана ГДР - это не уровень для разведки. Но не стоит забывать, как позиционируется и поныне Штази - некоторыми, вообще, как лучшая спецслужба в мире. А если так, то там вдвойне бывших не бывает. Разведка, которая не кончается никогда как новая серия бондианы...
Кстати, да, тут еще и настойчивый ответ президентским критикам: мол, соцстрана ГДР - это не уровень для разведки. Но не стоит забывать, как позиционируется и поныне Штази - некоторыми, вообще, как лучшая спецслужба в мире. А если так, то там вдвойне бывших не бывает. Разведка, которая не кончается никогда как новая серия бондианы...
BY Спец по специям
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
"Someone posing as a Ukrainian citizen just joins the chat and starts spreading misinformation, or gathers data, like the location of shelters," Tsekhanovska said, noting how false messages have urged Ukrainians to turn off their phones at a specific time of night, citing cybersafety. As a result, the pandemic saw many newcomers to Telegram, including prominent anti-vaccine activists who used the app's hands-off approach to share false information on shots, a study from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue shows. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from ua
