- «Минтруд России пересмотрит перечень мест, запрещенных для трудоустройства несовершеннолетних», — министр труда Котяков.
- «Все случаи въезда в Россию, перемещения по стране и выезда мигрантов должны быть поставлены под жёсткий контроль государства», — Медведев.
- Учителям на Урале подарили сертификаты на надгробия. Педагогов порадовал необычным подарком профсоюз в Нижнем Тагиле. Мол, помогает как может, даже скидки на путёвки в санатории выбивает.
- «Минтруд России пересмотрит перечень мест, запрещенных для трудоустройства несовершеннолетних», — министр труда Котяков.
- «Все случаи въезда в Россию, перемещения по стране и выезда мигрантов должны быть поставлены под жёсткий контроль государства», — Медведев.
- Учителям на Урале подарили сертификаты на надгробия. Педагогов порадовал необычным подарком профсоюз в Нижнем Тагиле. Мол, помогает как может, даже скидки на путёвки в санатории выбивает.
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried.
from ua
