В Новосибирске женщина попыталась передать наркотик через поцелуй в здании суда. Её заметили полицейские, когда подсудимого вели в зал.
Обвиняемый резко двинулся в сторону неизвестной, чтобы поцеловать, тогда-то лейтенант увидел подозрительный желто-зеленый сверток во рту у дамы. Передача выпала.
В Новосибирске женщина попыталась передать наркотик через поцелуй в здании суда. Её заметили полицейские, когда подсудимого вели в зал.
Обвиняемый резко двинулся в сторону неизвестной, чтобы поцеловать, тогда-то лейтенант увидел подозрительный желто-зеленый сверток во рту у дамы. Передача выпала.
Женщину задержали, ей грозит штраф или арест.
BY Карточный Домик: Россия
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed.
from ua
