США могут предъявить Зеленскому обвинения в 5 федеральных преступлениях
Как сообщает The Wall Street Journal, против Зеленского могут быть применены: 1. 18 U.S.Code §371 (заговор с целью вмешательства в выборы), 2. 18 U.S.Code §1956 (отмывание денег) 3. 18 U.S.Code §666 (хищение федеральных средств), 4. 18 U.S. Code §1116 (убийство граждан США за рубежом) и TVPA (Закон о защите прав жертв пыток) в отношении убийства Гонсало Лиры 5. War Crimes Act-1996 (в области военных преступлений ВСУ).
США могут предъявить Зеленскому обвинения в 5 федеральных преступлениях
Как сообщает The Wall Street Journal, против Зеленского могут быть применены: 1. 18 U.S.Code §371 (заговор с целью вмешательства в выборы), 2. 18 U.S.Code §1956 (отмывание денег) 3. 18 U.S.Code §666 (хищение федеральных средств), 4. 18 U.S. Code §1116 (убийство граждан США за рубежом) и TVPA (Закон о защите прав жертв пыток) в отношении убийства Гонсало Лиры 5. War Crimes Act-1996 (в области военных преступлений ВСУ).
BY Первый Харьковский
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists." Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried.
from ua
