⚡️⚡️⚡️Данные экзитпола. Опрос на выходе с избирательных участков прогнозирует Александру Осипову победу с результатом 89% голосов.
Явку Избирком Забайкалья объявлял на 18:00. Она составляла 41,15%, что уже на 6% выше показателя 2019 года. Окончательная явка на момент закрытия участков в 20:00 подсчитывается вместе с результатом.
⚡️⚡️⚡️Данные экзитпола. Опрос на выходе с избирательных участков прогнозирует Александру Осипову победу с результатом 89% голосов.
Явку Избирком Забайкалья объявлял на 18:00. Она составляла 41,15%, что уже на 6% выше показателя 2019 года. Окончательная явка на момент закрытия участков в 20:00 подсчитывается вместе с результатом.
BY Алиса в Забайкалье
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. Artem Kliuchnikov and his family fled Ukraine just days before the Russian invasion. Founder Pavel Durov says tech is meant to set you free He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information.
from ua
