"وأضاف رحِمه الله، إلى ما ذكره في الانتصار من مسائل القدريَّة مذهبَ الأشعريَّة؛ وقطَع حلوقهم وأفحمهم.. ففرِح الفُقهاء بكتابه، وانتسخوه، ودانوا الله به واعتقدوه".
- عمَر بن سمرة الجعدي صاحب طبقات فقهاء اليمن متحدِّثًا عن كتاب الشيخ أبي الحسين يحيى بن أبي الخير العمرانيِّ «الانتصار».
"وأضاف رحِمه الله، إلى ما ذكره في الانتصار من مسائل القدريَّة مذهبَ الأشعريَّة؛ وقطَع حلوقهم وأفحمهم.. ففرِح الفُقهاء بكتابه، وانتسخوه، ودانوا الله به واعتقدوه".
- عمَر بن سمرة الجعدي صاحب طبقات فقهاء اليمن متحدِّثًا عن كتاب الشيخ أبي الحسين يحيى بن أبي الخير العمرانيِّ «الانتصار».
The Security Service of Ukraine said in a tweet that it was able to effectively target Russian convoys near Kyiv because of messages sent to an official Telegram bot account called "STOP Russian War." But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. The regulator took order for the search and seizure operation from Judge Purushottam B Jadhav, Sebi Special Judge / Additional Sessions Judge. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from ua
