https://www.group-telegram.com/ostorozhno_novosti/32090. в сталинское время было такое понятие "лишенцы". Так что ничего нового. Кроме всяких финансовых ограничений, которых в сталинское время не было. Еще остается такая мера, как высылка за 101 километр
https://www.group-telegram.com/ostorozhno_novosti/32090. в сталинское время было такое понятие "лишенцы". Так что ничего нового. Кроме всяких финансовых ограничений, которых в сталинское время не было. Еще остается такая мера, как высылка за 101 километр
BY Бовт знает
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts. "We as Ukrainians believe that the truth is on our side, whether it's truth that you're proclaiming about the war and everything else, why would you want to hide it?," he said. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. "He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said.
from ua
