❗️🪖В Москве не доверяют словам президента Зеленского о том, что Киев не будет использовать ракетные системы залпового огня для атак на российскую территорию в случае их получения от США
«Для того, чтобы доверять, нужно иметь опыт случаев, когда данные обещания сдерживались. К сожалению, такой опыт отсутствует напрочь», - сказал пресс-секретарь Президента РФ Дмитрий Песков.
❗️🪖В Москве не доверяют словам президента Зеленского о том, что Киев не будет использовать ракетные системы залпового огня для атак на российскую территорию в случае их получения от США
«Для того, чтобы доверять, нужно иметь опыт случаев, когда данные обещания сдерживались. К сожалению, такой опыт отсутствует напрочь», - сказал пресс-секретарь Президента РФ Дмитрий Песков.
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from ua
