Придністров'я, яке залежить від постачання енергоносіїв з України, опинилося в складному становищі. Після припинення подачі російського газу зупинили роботу всі підприємства. Винятки становлять лише продовольчі виробництва.
А що сталось? Знову постраждала московська маріонетка від рук царя-батюшкі путіна?!
Придністров'я, яке залежить від постачання енергоносіїв з України, опинилося в складному становищі. Після припинення подачі російського газу зупинили роботу всі підприємства. Винятки становлять лише продовольчі виробництва.
А що сталось? Знову постраждала московська маріонетка від рук царя-батюшкі путіна?!
Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from ua
