Иронично, оказалось, что новость была не от Пинхаса Полонского (надеюсь, что его мама жива и проживет ещё 100 лет), но о Пинхасе Швальбе — человеке, о котором я вообще ничего не знаю и не понимаю, как оказался подписан на его канал. Что ж, ситуацию это не меняет, но только делает ещё ярче
В интернете пишут, что это глава Конгресса еврейских религиозных организаций и объединений России. Так что сути, действительно, не меняет
Иронично, оказалось, что новость была не от Пинхаса Полонского (надеюсь, что его мама жива и проживет ещё 100 лет), но о Пинхасе Швальбе — человеке, о котором я вообще ничего не знаю и не понимаю, как оказался подписан на его канал. Что ж, ситуацию это не меняет, но только делает ещё ярче
В интернете пишут, что это глава Конгресса еврейских религиозных организаций и объединений России. Так что сути, действительно, не меняет
BY Быть
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from ua
