Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 14 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50
Warning: file_put_contents(): Only 8192 of 8206 bytes written, possibly out of free disk space in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Daniel Haqiqatjou Official | Telegram Webview: haqiqatjou/10684 -
The Wahhabi practice of testing people about aqida is a bid'a characteristic of the Khawarij and a source of enormous fitna.
It is easy to design an aqida test to destroy any Muslim group through fitna, which is exactly what Wahhabis do against every other Muslim.
Consider the following aqida test. Were it applied en masse, it would destroy the Salafi movement.
This is why aqida testing is evil and is 100% contrary to the Sunna.
AQIDA TEST
Do you agree with Ibn Hanbal that Abu Hanifa was a deviant who spread lies about the religion? Or is this view itself deviance?
Do you agree with Ibn Hanbal that it is permissible to call on angels for help instead of Allah (at least if one is lost)? Or is this view deviant?
Do you agree with Ibn Taymiyya that it is permissible to call on jinn for help instead of Allah? Or is this view deviant?
Do you agree with Ibn Taymiyya that the dead (sometimes) do supernaturally offer help to those who request it from them (even if requesting itself is haram)? Or is this view deviant?
Do you agree with Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn al-Qayyim that it is permissible (or correct) to believe that hell is not eternal, and that mushriks who reject Islam will not be punished forever? Or is this view deviant?
Do you agree with Ibn Abd al-Wahhab that Prophet Adam committed shirk? Or is this view deviant?
Do you agree with Ibn Abd al-Wahhab declaring most Muslims to be kafir mushriks and waging jihad against them? Or is this view deviant?
Do you agree with Ibn Abd al-Wahhab that it is permissible to violently rebel against a ruler who does not apply Islamic laws? Or is this view deviant?
The Wahhabi practice of testing people about aqida is a bid'a characteristic of the Khawarij and a source of enormous fitna.
It is easy to design an aqida test to destroy any Muslim group through fitna, which is exactly what Wahhabis do against every other Muslim.
Consider the following aqida test. Were it applied en masse, it would destroy the Salafi movement.
This is why aqida testing is evil and is 100% contrary to the Sunna.
AQIDA TEST
Do you agree with Ibn Hanbal that Abu Hanifa was a deviant who spread lies about the religion? Or is this view itself deviance?
Do you agree with Ibn Hanbal that it is permissible to call on angels for help instead of Allah (at least if one is lost)? Or is this view deviant?
Do you agree with Ibn Taymiyya that it is permissible to call on jinn for help instead of Allah? Or is this view deviant?
Do you agree with Ibn Taymiyya that the dead (sometimes) do supernaturally offer help to those who request it from them (even if requesting itself is haram)? Or is this view deviant?
Do you agree with Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn al-Qayyim that it is permissible (or correct) to believe that hell is not eternal, and that mushriks who reject Islam will not be punished forever? Or is this view deviant?
Do you agree with Ibn Abd al-Wahhab that Prophet Adam committed shirk? Or is this view deviant?
Do you agree with Ibn Abd al-Wahhab declaring most Muslims to be kafir mushriks and waging jihad against them? Or is this view deviant?
Do you agree with Ibn Abd al-Wahhab that it is permissible to violently rebel against a ruler who does not apply Islamic laws? Or is this view deviant?
BY Daniel Haqiqatjou Official
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website. Ukrainian forces successfully attacked Russian vehicles in the capital city of Kyiv thanks to a public tip made through the encrypted messaging app Telegram, Ukraine's top law-enforcement agency said on Tuesday. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. "We're seeing really dramatic moves, and it's all really tied to Ukraine right now, and in a secondary way, in terms of interest rates," Octavio Marenzi, CEO of Opimas, told Yahoo Finance Live on Thursday. "This war in Ukraine is going to give the Fed the ammunition, the cover that it needs, to not raise interest rates too quickly. And I think Jay Powell is a very tepid sort of inflation fighter and he's not going to do as much as he needs to do to get that under control. And this seems like an excuse to kick the can further down the road still and not do too much too soon."
from ua
