короче эти долбоёбы попытались вызвать ментов по причине "В ЭТОМ ЗАВЕДЕНИИ НАС ОТКАЗЫВАЮТСЯ ОБСЛУЖИВАТЬ РЕШИТЕ ВОПРОС" не дождались их сдались после разговоров с гбр и съебались
короче эти долбоёбы попытались вызвать ментов по причине "В ЭТОМ ЗАВЕДЕНИИ НАС ОТКАЗЫВАЮТСЯ ОБСЛУЖИВАТЬ РЕШИТЕ ВОПРОС" не дождались их сдались после разговоров с гбр и съебались
BY Грандиозная братская канава
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. WhatsApp, a rival messaging platform, introduced some measures to counter disinformation when Covid-19 was first sweeping the world. What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried.
from ua
