Фашистские "факельцуги" в современной России Начало. Часть 1/11 На фото - сходка "Организации российских юных разведчиков", молодежного скаутского движения, приехавшего к нам вместе с русскими эмигрантами. В том числе - откровенными НТСниками и коллаборантами типа Ростислава Полчанинова.
Четвертый слева (в прифотошопленной скаутской шляпе) – фюрер "младороссов" А.Л. Казем-бек.
А справа, возле "царевича Алексея" - "качок" в очках, Борис Солоневич - брат "народного монархиста из резерва доктора Геббельса" и помощник Пантюхова по "спортивному воспитанию" царскосельских скаутов.
Фашистские "факельцуги" в современной России Начало. Часть 1/11 На фото - сходка "Организации российских юных разведчиков", молодежного скаутского движения, приехавшего к нам вместе с русскими эмигрантами. В том числе - откровенными НТСниками и коллаборантами типа Ростислава Полчанинова.
Четвертый слева (в прифотошопленной скаутской шляпе) – фюрер "младороссов" А.Л. Казем-бек.
А справа, возле "царевича Алексея" - "качок" в очках, Борис Солоневич - брат "народного монархиста из резерва доктора Геббельса" и помощник Пантюхова по "спортивному воспитанию" царскосельских скаутов.
At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said.
from ua
